NADP Journal – Contributors
Journal of Inclusive Practice in Further and Higher Education
NADP invites contributions from both members and non members for its peer reviewed journal
Papers for JIPFHE share the common aim of furthering best practice to promote disability equality in post compulsory education. Past papers have focussed on the whole student journey from transition into FE and HE; transition to work; and the experiences of disabled staff).
The main audience for JIPFHE is staff who work with disabled people in FE and HE and papers should be of practical use to this constituency as well as enabling readers to gain a deeper theoretical underpinning in critical disability studies upon which to develop their day to day professional work.
JIPFHE has a refereed section which includes peer reviewed papers, and a practitioner-focussed general section.
Contributions from disabled / neurodiverse people about their own experiences of post 14 education and training (in its broadest sense) are very welcome based on the principle of “nothing about us without us”.
Contributions for the peer-reviewed section should reflect ethical participatory / emancipatory research, which involves disabled / neurodiverse participants and results in interventions which improve services for disabled / neurodiverse people in the post 14 (education and training) sector.
Writing your Paper
Articles should be between 2500 and 6500 words, usually around 3,500 to 4.500. You may be asked to reduce the number of words even if your article is less than 6500, if the referees feel that you could express yourself more succinctly.
An abstract of no more than 300 words is required for research based articles (not for reflective pieces about personal experiences).
Ethical guidelines prescribe that research participants should not be identifiable, and confidentiality must be respected. A clear ethics statement is required.
Harvard referencing is required and at least 50% of your references need to be no more than three years old.
Please submit your paper via the NADP office firstname.lastname@example.org.
The paper will be sent to the editor (who will be a member of the editorial board).
Two referees, nominated by the editor, will review the paper anonymously and return their comments to the editor. The editor will either then contact the author about the outcome or liaise first with the editorial board if there is not sufficient agreement between the reviewers. The outcome will be that the paper is deemed appropriate (usually subject to modifications) or unsuitable for JIPFHE. Refereeing takes time because of the liaison involved so please be patient. You will be given a reasonable timescale to make amendments.